雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

The Logic of Scientific Reasoning in Peer Review Process Norio Takata 1 , Masaru Mimura 2 1Division of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine 2Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine Keyword: 査読 , 科学的推論 , 論理 , 査読回答書 , peer review , scientific reasoning , logic , rebuttal letter pp.335-340
Published Date 2022/4/1
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1416202040
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

Abstract

We outlined the logical argumentation of scientific reasoning, focusing on peer-reviewed rebuttal letters. Initially, we compared the argumentation in the peer review process with that in writing papers, and distinguished between commonly used argumentation and those that are characteristic of rebuttal letters. First, commonly used forms of logical argumentation, such as deductive and inductive argumentation, are introduced, followed by examples of typical errors in reasoning. Subsequently, we explain the forms of logical argumentation characteristic of the peer review process, including the issue of incommensurability and the error of double standards. This article aims to improve our skills in responding to peer-review comments by being more aware of the logical argumentation used in peer review.


Copyright © 2022, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1344-8129 印刷版ISSN 1881-6096 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有