雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

A case of uveitis and meningitis followed by palpebral zoster Moeno Osaka 1 , Junichiro Kizaki 1 , Hidetoshi Onda 1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Showa University School of Medicine pp.1279-1284
Published Date 2024/10/15
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1410215304
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

Abstract Purpose:We report a case of eyelid inflammation, meningitis, and uveitis caused by the varicella zoster virus(VZV).

Case:The patient was a 55-year-old woman with a history of chickenpox and oral herpes, currently being treated for rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and upadacitinib. She noticed a dull pain in the right side of her head. Eight days later, she developed swelling of the upper right eyelid, along with numbness and sensory impairment in the right facial area and oral cavity. On the tenth day, she was referred to our hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Her initial corrected visual acuity was 1.2 in both eyes. The right upper eyelid exhibited swelling and internal bleeding, but there were no signs of intraocular inflammation. We suspected that the inflammation was due to cellulitis and started the patient on 1 g of cefazolin. However, antibiotic therapy it had no effect, so we performed cerebrospinal fluid(CSF)test. Cell count in the CSF was found to be elevated, and VZV was detected through polymerase chain reaction(PCR). Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)revealed contrast enhancement in the right eyelid, lateral rectus muscle, lacrimal gland, and cavernous sinus, indicating the spread of inflammation caused by VZV to these areas. We therefore started treatment with 1.5 g aciclovir. However, two days after the initiation of antiviral therapy, ocular inflammation with vitreous opacity was observed, and VZV was detected in the anterior chamber fluid through PCR. Oral prednisolone(30 mg/day)was also administered for anti-inflammatory purposes, and the anterior chamber inflammation and vitreous opacification disappeared 18 days after the first visit.

Conclusion:The lack of typical skin findings was one of the reasons for the delay in diagnosis and treatment. If a differential diagnosis and treatment were made early, the inflammation may not have spread to the eye.


Copyright © 2024, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1882-1308 印刷版ISSN 0370-5579 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有