Clinial appraisal of Medmont static perimeter. Report 2 Rika Ota 1 , Hiroyuki Furukawa 1 , Hiroto Yamada 1 , Tunekazu Ota 2 , Masao Sugawara 2 1Dept of Ophthalmol, National Yokohama Hosp 2NEITZ Co. Ltd pp.899-901
Published Date 1996/5/15
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1410904891
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside

We evaluated the clinical usefulness of glaucoma screen program of Medmont static perimeter, M600, in 37 glaucoma eyes. The findings were compared with those by Humphrey static perimeter. Almost identical findings were obtained in 18 eyes, 49%. More numerous scotomas were detected in 8 eyes, 22%. Lesser number of scotoma were detected in 10 eyes, 27%. Largely different results between the two methods were obtained in 1 eye, 3%. The findings show the clinical usefulness of Medmont perimeter as the examination can be completed within 3 minutes and 15 seconds which is about one half required for examination by Humphrey perimeter.

Copyright © 1996, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.


電子版ISSN 1882-1308 印刷版ISSN 0370-5579 医学書院