雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Adversive Movement in Epileptic Seizure:II Experimental Study and Conclusion Koichi Kitamura 1 1Neurosurgical Clinic, Tokyo University pp.139-143
Published Date 1953/5/1
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1406200342
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside

The author confirmed in the previous report that the initial adversive movement occured in the direction opposite to the side of the focus wherever it might exsist in the cerebral hemisphere except for the temporal region, and that in the many cases of non-focal types of epilepsy such as grand mal and petit mal the direction of the initial adversive movement was consistent.

From this point of view, the traditional theory, that the adversive movement was represented only in the circumscribed cortical area, i. e. the so-called adversive field, seems to be ques-tionable.

a) In the dog it was uncertein to produce epileptogenic foci (spiking foci) with Alu-mina cream in the cerebral cortex.

b) The adversive movement in the convulsive seizure induced by slow intravenous inject-ion of pentazol solution was studied in dogs having strychninized foci in the cerebral cortex. During the convulsive seizure, the side towards which the adversive movement was directed changed frequently, but the direction of the initial adversive movement was constant and opposite to the strychn-inized side in each seizure in all strychn-inized dogs.

c) In the induced general convulsive seizure of the dogs, in which the unilateral hemi-spherectomy leaving the subcortical nuclei had been performed, the direction of the adversive movement was altered frequently during the seizure, but the side towards which the initial adversive movement was directed, was constantly opposite to the hemispherectomized side. This might be presumably due to the dominant activity of the subcortical nuclei on that side caused by loss of inhibition from the cortex.

d) Thus, it could be stated that in the epile-ptic convulsive seizure the direction of the initial adversive movement would be con-stantly opposite to the side of the domi-nantly discharging subcortex.

e) From the clinical and experimental studies it might be inferred that even in many (70%) non-focal cases of grand mal and petit mal the subcortical nuclei have more dominant discharge on one side than the other.


Copyright © 1953, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 2185-405X 印刷版ISSN 0006-8969 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有