Japanese

Problems of Group Classification from a Medical Point of View, Report of a Questionnaire Survey Tsutomu Hamada 1 , Yoshihide Otani 2 , Akinori Iwashita 3 , Takashi Yao 4 1Department of Gastroenterology, Social Health Insurance Medical Center 2Department of Sargery, Keio University School of Medicine 3Department of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital 4Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University Keyword: 生検 , Group分類 , Group III病変 , インフォームド・コンセント , 院内連携 pp.1456-1461
Published Date 2004/10/25
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1403100580
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference
  • Cited by

 A questionnaire survey concerning Group Classification(GC)for gastric biopsy specimens was responded to by fifty medical hospitals. The results of the questionnaire were as follows. GC was very useful to indicate the degree of atypism and it made it easy to get informed consent for medical care. On the other hand, a difference of opinion about GC by pathologists was noticed mostly concerning the diagnosis of Group II or IV, and Group III should be qualified only for gastric adenoma. Revision of GC in accord with international standard was supported by a large majority but there is a gap between the Vienna Classification and GC.

 98% out of pathologists referred to the clinical findings when they made a diagnosis, so it is important to keep smooth communication between clinicians and pathologists.

 1) Department of Gastroenterology, Social Health Insurance Medical Center, Tokyo

 2) Department of Sargery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo

 3) Department of Pathology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikushino, Japan

 4) Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan


Copyright © 2004, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1882-1219 印刷版ISSN 0536-2180 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有