Japanese
English
- 有料閲覧
- Abstract 文献概要
- 1ページ目 Look Inside
- 参考文献 Reference
要約 目的:20Gと21Gチップを用いた水晶体乳化吸引術の比較。対象と方法:それぞれ同じ術者が水晶体乳化吸引術を行った86眼を対象とした。43眼には3.0mmの角膜切開と20Gのチップ,他の43眼には2.3mmの角膜切開と21Gのチップを用いた。結果:超音波の平均出力は,20G群で24.9±5.9%,21G群で27.3±4.9%で,両群間に有意差があった(p=0.0198)。手術時間,超音波作動時間,術後の角膜内皮減少率については両群間に差はなかった。術中の印象として,21G手術では破砕と吸引の効率が低く,ペダルを強く踏み込むために超音波の出力が大きくなった。結論:20Gと21Gチップを用いた水晶体乳化吸引術では,手術時間,超音波作動時間,術後の角膜内皮減少率につき,両術式の間に大差はなかった。
Abstract. Purpose:To compare 20 G and 21 G ultrasound chip in phacoemulsification-aspiration surgery. Cases and Method:This study was made on 86 eyes that received cataract surgery by same surgeon. 20 G chip with 3.0 mm corneal incision was used in 43 eyes. 21 G chip with 2.3 mm corneal incision was used in the other 43 eyes. Results:Power of ultrasound averaged 24.9±5.9% in 20 G group and 27.3±4.9%. The difference was significant(p=0.0198). There was no difference between the two groups regarding duration of surgery,application time of ultrasound,and postoperative decrease in corneal endothelial cells. There was a feeling that 21 G surgery resulted in lesser efficiency of phacoemulsification-aspiration needing greater ultrasound output. Conclusion:There was no major difference between 20 G and 21 G chip in cataract surgery.
Copyright © 2010, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.