雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Developing a Weighted Disuse Risk Factor Evaluation and Disuse Risk Score Rating for Disuse Syndrome Hironobu Sashika 1 , Kazuya Mizuochi 2 , Naohisa Kikuchi 2 , Hidetaka Wakabayashi 1 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital Keyword: 廃用症候群(disuse syndrome) , 廃用リスク(risk factor for disuse syndrome) , コンジョイント分析(conjoint analysis) , リハビリテーション医療(medical rehabilitation) pp.166-175
Published Date 2010/3/18
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

Abstract : Objective : To develop a weighted disuse risk score rating. Design : Based on specified selection criteria, items of the disuse risk factor were chosen. Then, a conjoint questionnaire for physicians was created using orthogonal cards with ordinal disuse risk grade. Conjoint analysis (SPSS 15.0) was performed, weighting each item and making a formula for calculating the disuse risk score. Setting : The Rehabilitation Department of a University Hospital. Participants : Forty-one physician respondents and 129 consecutive inpatients referred to the rehabilitation department. Main outcome measures : Agreement of the rated disuse risk grade with the calculated disuse risk score, and the reliability of the calculated disuse risk score of the 129 inpatients. Results : Eleven disuse risk factor items were selected ; age, malignant tumor, heart impairment, respiratory impairment, kidney impairment, pain, gait disorder, psychiatric impairment, intellectual disability, dementia, and body mass index. Forty-one physicians completed and returned a postal questionnaire. Cronbach's α of the rated disuse risk grade was 0.948. The correlation coefficient of the average rated disuse risk grade to the calculated disuse risk score was 0.985 (p=0.000). Items of high overall importance (%) were gait disorder (14.0%), malignant tumor (11.5%), and respiratory impairment (11.0%). Those of low overall importance (%) were body mass index (6.8%), kidney impairment (6.6%), and psychiatric impairment (6.1%). For the 129 patients, the calculated disuse risk score of the 11-item was correlated to that of the 9-item weighted disuse risk factor (R=0.930, p=0.000). Conclusions : Both the 11-item disuse risk factor and the weighted disuse risk score rating were considered reliable and useful.


Copyright © 2010, The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 印刷版ISSN 1881-3526 日本リハビリテーション医学会

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有