Japanese
English
- 有料閲覧
- Abstract 文献概要
- 1ページ目 Look Inside
- 参考文献 Reference
◆要旨:松山市の中核病院である当院(745床)で2004年より施行した腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術と従来の開腹虫垂切除術との結果を比較し報告する.2002年6月~2007年5月までの5年間の虫垂炎症例153例の内,腹腔鏡下手術例(以下,L群)60例と開腹手術例(以下,O群)93例を比較して,手術時間,術後入院期間,手術部位感染(以下,SSI)を検討した.平均手術時間はL群とO群との間に有意差は認めなかった.平均術後入院期間では,L群において有意に在院日数は短く(6.9日±8.9日vs 11.8日±10.3日:P<0.01),SSI発症率でもL群が有意に低率であった(2例(3.3%)vs 16例(17.2%):P<0.01).腹腔鏡下虫垂切除術は患者のQOLを考慮すれば推奨しうる手術と考えられる.
From June 2002 to May 2007 , 60 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy(L group)at Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital were compared with 93 adult patients with open appendectomy(O group). Operation time, surgical site infection(SSI)and postoperative hospitalization were compared. There was no significant difference in the average operation time between L group(82±92 minutes)and O group(83±43 minutes). Significant difference was observed for SSI ; two patients in L group(3.3%)and 16 patients in O group(17.2%)had SSI(P<0.01). Postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter for L group(6.9±8.9 days vs 11.8±10.3 days ; P<0.01). Laparoscopic appendectomy is recommended at the community hospital considering the patient's quality of life.
Copyright © 2009, JAPAN SOCIETY FOR ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY All rights reserved.