雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

An Examination of Qualitative Research in the Japanese Health Sciences, Part 3 : Data Analysis Shigeko Saiki-Craighill 1 , Yoshie Mito 2 , Misa Seki 3 1Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University 2Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University 3Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University Keyword: 質的研究法 , グラウンデッド・セオリー・アプローチ , 分析法の説明 , 分析法の使用 , qualitative research , grounded theory approach , explanation of methods , implementation of methods pp.694-703
Published Date 2012/12/15
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1681100726
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference
  • Cited by

 One hundred sixty original articles that used Grounded Theory Approach (GTA) and were published between 2001 and 2010 in health science journals were examined from the perspective of how data analysis procedures (extraction of concept, concept linkage) and techniques (line by line coding, comparison, theoretical sampling, theoretical saturation) were explained and implemented. Of these procedures and techniques that were tracked, only “extraction of concept” and “comparison” were appropriately explained in over half the articles. The implementation of techniques and procedures was also flawed. Based on what could be determined from the articles, the ones that used “line by line coding” correctly were in the thirty percent range of the total, the ones that used “comparisons” correctly were in the twenty percent range of the total, the ones that used “extraction of concepts” and “theoretical sampling” correctly were in the ten percent range of the total, and the ones that used “concept linkage” and “theoretical saturation” correctly amounted to only a small handful. Consequently, concepts were not developed based on data. Instead, many articles only summarized data, and many articles showed concept linkages that were based only on the authors' own impressions. Articles that appropriately developed new findings amounted to no more than twenty percent of the total. Considering this, it is difficult to say that GTA is properly understood and appropriately used.


Copyright © 2012, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1882-1405 印刷版ISSN 0022-8370 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有