雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Evidence of speech-language-hearing therapy for aphasia in Japan:A systematic review Michiko Kanno 1 , Tomohiro Omori 1 , Erika Sakuraoka 2 , Takuya Nakayama 2 , Shinya Uchida 3 , Mutsuko Sato 4 , Jun Katsuki 5 , Hideko Mizuta 6 , Hikaru Nakamura 7 , Masako Tateishi 8 , Ikuyo Fujita 9 1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, School of Health Sciences at Narita, International University of Health and Welfare 2Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Juntendo University 4Department of Neuropsychology, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience 5Yawata Medical Center 6Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University 7Department of Contemporary Welfare Science, School of Welfare Science, Okayama Prefectural University 8Japanese Association of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists 9Department of Speech, Language of Hearing Sciences, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare Keyword: 失語症 , 日本 , 言語聴覚療法 , エビデンス , システマティックレビュー , aphasia , Japan , speech-language-hearing therapy , evidence , systematic review pp.51-65
Published Date 2025/1/31
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.134958280220050051
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

 Purpose:A systematic review was performed to compile evidence on the outcomes of speech-language-hearing therapy for non-progressive aphasia in Japan.

 Method:Eligibility criteria were established based on the research question, and literature was collected using Ichushi-Web, Isho-jp, PubMed, and hand searching. After a primary and secondary screening, a qualitative evaluation was conducted on the accepted studies.

 Results:A total of 24 studies were accepted, including 10 nonrandomized controlled trials, 4 case-control studies, 7 single case studies, and 5 case series. Of these, 22 of the studies, which was by far the majority of them, involved language therapy while only 2 studies involved functional communication training. The former showed recovery in language function and the latter in communicative competence, with some generalization to discourse.

 Discussion:Language therapy and functional communication training were conducted for non-progressive aphasia, and recovery of language function and communication ability and partial generalization were confirmed. In the future, it is hoped that the amount of high-level evidence-based research looking at function, activity, and participation will increase.


Copyright © 2025, Japanese Association of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 印刷版ISSN 1349-5828 日本言語聴覚士協会

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有