雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Impairment : Syntax Masumi Watanabe 1 Keyword: 文産生 , 文理解 , 統語の障害 , 介入法 , sentence production , sentence comprehension , syntactic disorder , intervention pp.55-62
Published Date 2010/3/15
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.6001100233

閲覧方法のご案内

この論文を閲覧するためにはログインが必要になります。
パスワードを忘れた場合 新しくユーザー登録する 施設共通IDをご利用の方はこちらから

PPV購入案内

1,320円 (1,200円+税10%) こちらは、55ページから62ページの文献です。
PPV(ペイ・パー・ビュー)とは、論文(記事)単位で購入・閲覧ができるサービスです。
購入には医書.jp本会員登録が必要です。



会員登録完了後に改めて上記「購入サイトへ」を選択してください。
または「購入サイトへ」選択後に「購入ログイン」、「新規会員登録」の順に進んでください。

会員登録について詳しくはをご確認ください。
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

 Impairment of sentence production and comprehension due to syntactic disorder in aphasic patients causes deficient communication which, in turn, may lead to limitations in their activity and participation. Therefore, identification of the core factors underlying the disorder is essential for developing effective intervention methods that facilitate communication.

 A variety of intervention methods for sentence processing deficits have been proposed, each of which is based on a different hypothesis for the syntactic disorder. Linebarger et al (1983) advocated "mapping therapy," which hypothesizes that agrammatic patients cannot map thematic roles of nouns on the relevant syntactic structures. In contrast, Webster et al (2005) asserts that agrammatism comes from inadequate construction of argument structures required by verbs. Conroy et al (2009) claim that poor sentence production often reflects an inefficiency in retrieval of verbs, per se. Thompson et al (2007) proposed a syntax treatment method called TUF (Treatment of Underlying Form) in which training begins with sentences with the most complex syntactic structure. Linebarger et al (2007) developed a computer assisted treatment method which compensates for reduction of sentence processing resource or working memory capacity of aphasic patients.

 Apart from TUF, the above treatment methods are minimally influenced by any language difference. However, when adapting TUF to a Japanese agrammatic patient, the difference between Japanese and English needs to be considered. Elucidation of mechanisms underlying impaired sentence processing is a first step to improve the QOL of agrammatic patients.


Copyright © 2010, Japanese Association of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 印刷版ISSN 1349-5828 日本言語聴覚士協会

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有