雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Reinvestigation of CSF Outflow Resistance Value in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: ―Comparing Epidural Pressure Monitoring with Lumbar Subarachnoid Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Monitoring― Totaro TAKEUCHI 1 , Hiromi GOTO 2 , Kenji IZAKI 2 , Kohei KOKUBU 2 , Masaya ODA 2 , Jin-ichi SASANUMA 2 , Kazushige MAENO 2 , Yasuhiro KIKUCHI 2 , Jin-ichi KOIZUMI 2 , Zen-ichiro WATANABE 2 , Yasunobu ITO 2 , Hiroo OHARA 2 , Masayoshi KOWADA 2 , Kazuo WATANABE 2 1Department of Neurosurgery,The Southern TOHOKU High Degree Medical Center,Sourthern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience 2Department of Neurosurgery,The Sourhern TOHOKU General Hospital,Sourthern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience Keyword: normal pressure hydrocephalus , idiopathic , cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance , epidural pressure , lumbar subarachnoid CSF pressure pp.579-584
Published Date 2005/6/1
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1436100083
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

Purpose To compare the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow resistance values (Ro) with epidural pressure (EDP) monitoring and lumbar subarachnoid CSF pressure (L-CSFP) monitoring.

 Subjects and methods The subjects were 14 patients with possible iNPH (age: 59-74years old,ratio of male and female 8:6). All the patients were subiected to an infusion test by a single bolus injection method (1ml/sec.,ΔV: 5 ml, t2: 2 min) as prescribed in the Standard of SINPHONI. EDP was monitored by continuous monitoring and the L-CSFP values By intermittent simple glass tube method (SINPHONI) were measured simultaneously. The Ro (RoEDP, RoL-CSFP) calculated from both methods, (1) the correlation of Ro and (2) the Ro threshold in a shunt effective group (E: nine cases) and a non effective group (NE, five cases) were compared.

 Results (1) Although a favorable correlation was found between both Ro measurements (r=0.784), the RoEDP was always higher than the RoL-CSFP. (2) The mean Ro values in the E and NE groups were 36.8 ± 15.7 mmHg/ml/min, and 10 ± 2.05 mmHg/ml/min for Ro-EDP, 22.1 ± 13.95 mmHg/ml/min and 6.4 ± 1.7 mmHg/ml/min for RoL-CSFP, respectively. The approxilmate thresholds in the E and NE groups were 15 mmHg/ml/min for RoEDP and 10 mmHg/ml/min for RoL-CSFP.

 Conclusion (1) Although the RoEDP is always higher than the RoL-CSFP, a favorable correlation is found between the RoEDP and RoL-CSFP, (2) The Ro thresholds of the E and NE groups in the infusion test are about 15 mmHg/ml/min for RoEDP and 10 mmHg/ml/min for RoL-CSFP. (3) After this, Ro calculation ought to execute by standard of SINPHONI and the Ro threshold of the E and NE groups is about 10 mmHg/ml/min.


Copyright © 2005, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1882-1251 印刷版ISSN 0301-2603 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有