Japanese
English
- 有料閲覧
- Abstract 文献概要
- 1ページ目 Look Inside
- 参考文献 Reference
症例は16歳の男性で,14歳時から右肘関節痛を自覚した.テニス肘と診断され,MRI検査などを受けたが2年6カ月間もの長期にわたり確定診断に至らず,当院を紹介され受診となった.CTで上腕骨滑車部分にnidusを認め,上腕骨遠位部類骨骨腫の診断で腫瘍摘出術を行った.病理診断は類骨骨腫であり,疼痛は消失し,術後2年の現在,再発は認めていない.長期に及ぶ関節痛を訴える患者ではMRIがCTよりも先に撮影されることが多い.しかし類骨骨腫を念頭に置かなければMRIを撮影していても本症例のように見逃される可能性がある.
We report the case of a 16-year-old male with osteoid osteoma of the distal humerus. At 14 years of age he presented at a nearby hospital with pain in his right elbow and was diagnosed with tennis elbow. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed, but his elbow pain persisted. He consulted 4 other hospitals, and magnetic resonance imaging was performed, but no definitive diagnosis was reached. At 16 years of age he came to our hospital, A radiography revealed a radiolucent area in the trochlea of the humerus and a CT scan showed a nidus lesion in the same area. Based on these findings we made a diagnosis of osteoid osteoma of the distal humerus, and surgically removed the tumor. The final pathology report comfirmed the diagnosis. At the 18-month follow-up examination, the patient was pain-free and had a full range of motion in his elbow. Our experience with this case suggested that osteoid osteoma must be included in the differential diagnosis even when interpreting MRI findings in a patient with longstanding articular pain.
Copyright © 2009, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.