雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Examining the Reliability and Usability of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Japanese Version(LCJR-J) Yoko Kitajima 1 , Yasuko Hosoda 2 , Mayumi Negishi 3 , Yukari Katayama 4 , Fumi Akasaki 5 , Yoshiko Doi 2 , Kathie Lasater 6 , Ann Nielsen 6 1Faculty of Nursing, Gifu University of Medical Science 2Graduate School of Nursing, Osaka Metropolitan University 3School of Nursing, University of Shizuoka 4Faculty of Nursing, Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts 5Faculty of Nursing, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University 6School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University Keyword: ラサター臨床判断ルーブリック , 臨床判断 , シミュレーション , Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric , clinical judgment , simulation pp.228-238
Published Date 2024/12/31
  • Abstract
  • Reference
  • Cited by

 Objective: This study examined the reliability and usability of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Japanese Version(LCJR-J).

 Methods: The simulations of seven students were evaluated by four raters using the LCJR-J, and the rate of agreement between the raters was calculated. The students self-evaluated their simulations, and the LCJR-J scores given by the students and raters were compared. Group interviews were conducted to qualitatively and inductively analyze the LCJR-J's usability.

 Results: Calculating the concordance rate showed that the reliability between raters was within an acceptable range. No significant differences in LCJR-J scores were observed between students and raters, except for "evaluation/self-analysis." Regarding usability, students identified "advantage through utilization," "visualization of the continuous learning process," "inclination toward simple evaluation," "utilization according to level," and "learning support through positive expression." Meanwhile, raters highlighted "usefulness as an evaluation indicator," "focusing on the thought of clinical judgment, " "support of development for nursing practice, " "evaluation of clinical simulation," and "inclination toward valid evaluation."

 Conclusion: The LCJR-J evaluation demonstrates a certain level of concordance, facilitates sharing of clinical judgment perspectives, and has the potential to be used as a developmental rubric through its use in continuous dialogue.


Copyright © 2024, Japan Academy of Nursing Science. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 2185-8888 印刷版ISSN 0287-5330 日本看護科学学会

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有