雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF L-DOPA ALONE AND COMBINATION WITH A PERIPHERAL DOPA DECARBOXYLASE INHIBITOR, HCL-BENSERAZIDE, ON PARKINSON'S DISEASE : PART I: CLINICAL ASPECTS Masayuki Yokochi 1 , Tomoyoshi Kondo 1 , Keizo Hirayama 1 , Hirotaro Narabayashi 1 , Isamu Kuruma 2 1Department of Neurology, Juntendo University 2Nippon Roche Research Center pp.295-304
Published Date 1979/3/1
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1406204387
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside

The L-DOPA treatment with DOPA de-carboxylase inhibitor permits a reduction in DOPA dosage and in some peripheral side effects inParkinson's disease. We have started one of these drugs, MADOPAR (L-DOPA 100 mg and bensera-zide 25 mg in every capsule) on 1974. The present paper aims to analyse our own clinical experience with L-DOPA treatment or MADOPAR treatment. Either treatment were done for the same groupe of 25 patients with paralysis agitans, 9 men and 16 women. The age of these patients was 61.8+ 8. 8 year old, course of illness being 7. 4+4.4 years and duration of MADOPAR treatment was 13.5+ 6. 9 months.

1) The mean maintenance dose of L-DOPA was 2100+700 mg/day in L-DOPA alone treatment and 418+173 mg/day in MADOPAR treatment. From this finding, the effect of MADOPAR is culculated five times of that of L-DOPA alone.

2) The clinical effects of the treatment with MADOPAR was superior to the treatment with L-DOPA alone on many symptoms. Score of rigidity and tremor showed better in rate of im-provement, akinesisa and disturbance of ADL showed the second improvement, and Yahr's score did not show the significant change on both regimens.

3) Adverse effects : Thirty two percent of patients L-DOPA groupe complained nausea, which was only eight percent MADOPAR groupe. The blood pressure did not change significantly on either groupe. The slight oscillation of symptoms in daytime was observed in only two cases in either groupe. The involuntary movement (induced by L-DOPA) increased to thirty six percent by MADOPAR as compare with twelve percent by L-DOPA alone. The dosage of MADOPAR in patients presenting involuntary movement was not always so high as for maintenance dosage. It is therefore considered that the dyskinesia may be due to the susceptibility of each indivisual patient to medicine, rather than its dosage.

4) GUR (Global Utility Rating), that takes the concideration of clinical effects and adverse effects, was superior for MADOPAR in thirteen cases to L-DOPA. Eight cases showed equal effects on either therapy and other four cases was inferior on MADOPAR therapy.

5) The comparison of clinical effects between MADOPAR and the combination therapy with L-DOPA and MK-486 was investigated in the preve-ous reports.


Copyright © 1979, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 2185-405X 印刷版ISSN 0006-8969 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有