雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

Differential Diagnosis by Using the Pervasive Developing Disorder-Autism Society Japan Rating Scale (PARS) for Adolescents and Adults:A preliminary investigation Yuka YASUDA 1,2,3,4 , Ryota HASHIMOTO 1,2,3,4 , Kazutaka OHI 2,3,4 , Motoyuki FUKUMOTO 2,3,4 , Takanori TAKAMURA 2,3,4 , Ikuko MOHRI 1 , Masako TANIIKE 1 , Masatoshi TAKEDA 1,2 1The Osaka-Hamamatsu Joint Research Center for Child Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan 2Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine 3CREST (Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology) 4JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency) Keyword: Pervasive developmental disorders , PDD , PDD-Autism Society Japan Rating Scale , PARS , Differential Diagnosis pp.1197-1203
Published Date 2009/12/15
DOI https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1405101538
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

 It is often diffcult to differentiate pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) from other psychotic disorders in individuals having PDD but not childhood history of typical autistic phenotypes. The current paper focuses on the reliabilty of the PDD-Autism Society Japan Rating Scale (PARS) when used for the differential diagnosis of adolescents and adults with or without PDD. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the retrospective rating obtained using PARS (the full-scale and short versions) for adolescents and adults with PDD (n=19) and for patients with other psychiatric disorders (n=27) who were diagnosed according to the DSM-Ⅳcriteria;both the infancy subscale and the current subscale were used. The current subscale had good sensitivity (full scale, 83%;short version, 83%) and specificity (full-scale, 85%;short version, 89%) in identifying PDD, a finding similar to that reported in the original study "Reliability and Validity of the Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD)-Autism Society Japan Rating Scale (PARS):A behavior checklist for adolescents and adults with PDDs" that reported by Kamio et al (2006). In contrast, the infancy subscale showed worse sensitivity (full-scale, 32%;short scale, 42%) than that reported in the original study (corresponding values:94% and 91%), but good specificity (corresponding values:82% and 96%), which were similar to that reported in the original study. We anticipate that the current subscale of PARS (the short version) for adolescents and adults will permit clinicians to accurately differentiate between individuals with PDD from those who with other psychotic disorders, thereby allowing better diagnostic classification.


Copyright © 2009, Igaku-Shoin Ltd. All rights reserved.

基本情報

電子版ISSN 1882-126X 印刷版ISSN 0488-1281 医学書院

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有