雑誌文献を検索します。書籍を検索する際には「書籍検索」を選択してください。

検索

書誌情報 詳細検索 by 医中誌

Japanese

When Should We Perform Surgery for N2 Lung Cancer?;Induction Chemoradiotherapy or Surgery for Local Recurrence or Residual Tumor after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Hiroyuki Ito 1 , Haruhiko Nakayama 1 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center Keyword: lung cancer , salvage surgery , induction chemoradiotherapy , definitive chemoradiotherapy pp.290-299
Published Date 2018/4/1
DOI https://doi.org/10.15106/j_kyobu71_290
  • Abstract
  • Look Inside
  • Reference

Background:Standard treatment for locally advanced clinical N2 lung cancer is definitive chemo-radiotherapy, and induction chemoradiotherapy(IND-CRT)followed by surgery is an option. Most of them recurs remotely within a few years after initial therapy. Patients who received salvage surgery (SAL) after definitive chemoradiotherapy had no remote relapse for some period after definitive chemoradiotherapy, thus the outcome of SAL may be better than those of IND-CRT, but the operative risks of both procedures seem to be high.

Objective:To compare the prognosis and risk of SAL and IND-CRT.

Method:From January 2001 through December 2015, 39 patients with clinical N2 primary lung cancer underwent surgery after chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-six patients received IND-CRT, and 13 underwent SAL. Perioperative factors, overall survival rates at 5 years, lung-cancer-specific mortality, relapse-free survival rates, and the rates of perioperative complications were compared between the groups.

Result:The median follow up period was 41.0 months(5~120 months). Twelve patients were women, and 27 were men. The average age was 60.2 years. The patients comprised 1.7% of the 2,330 anatomical resections performed during the same period. The radiation dose was 46.4 Gy who received IND-CRT and 61.4 Gy in those who received SAL(p<0.001). In patients who received IND-CRT, median period from the end of the initial treatment to surgery was 1.2 months in IND-CRT and 17.2 months in SAL. Lobectomy was performed in 37 patients, pneumonectomy in 2 patients. In patients who received IND-CRT, an average operation time was 236 minutes, mean bleeding volume was 135 g. In patients who underwent SAL, they were 236 minutes and 188 g(p=0.998, p=0.365). There was no perioperative and in-hospital death in either group. Postoperative complications developed in 5 of IND-CRT(19.2%)and 3 in SAL(23.1%). The 5-year overall survival rate of all cases was 60.4%(IND-CRT 53.9, SAL 81.8%;p=0.737). The lung cancer-specific survival rate at 5 years was 60.4% overall, 57.5% in IND-CRT, and 90.0% in SAL(p=0.176). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 52.7% overall, 37.6% in IND-CRT, 57.7% in SAL(p=0.175). Although the differences were not statistically significant, SAL tended to have better outcomes.

Conclusion:SAL did not differ significantly from IND-CRT with respect to postoperative complications or surgical invasiveness in patients with clinical N2 lung cancer and had good outcomes. SAL and IND-CRT seem to be a sufficiently meaningful treatment but should be performed by surgeons with sufficient knowledge and experience.


© Nankodo Co., Ltd., 2018

基本情報

電子版ISSN 2432-9436 印刷版ISSN 0021-5252 南江堂

関連文献

もっと見る

文献を共有